Teresa Heinz Kerry and the “New Environmentalists”
Tuesday, May 1st, 2007This spring Massachusetts Senator John Kerry and his wife Teresa Heinz Kerry have crisscrossed the country much as they did during the senator’s Democratic bid for the presidency in 2004.
This time the two are on a different campaign, to champion the work of so-called “new environmentalists” and their causes through their just-released book “This Moment on Earth: Today’s New Environmentalists and their Vision for the Future.”
Both Kerry and Heinz have been long time leaders in environmental causes. As a fourterm U.S. senator, Kerry has won consistently high approval ratings from environmental watchdog groups and has sponsored wide-ranging federal legislation to protect the oceans, regional fisheries and air quality.
As chairman of The Howard Heinz Endowment and the Heinz Family Philanthropies, Teresa Heinz has been recognized as one of this country’s leading philanthropists and as a visionary leader on issues of health and the environment, education, community development and the arts. Since taking the helm of the Heinz family philanthropies after the 1991 death of her first husband Senator John Heinz, she has overseen the awarding of millions of dollars annually.
Heinz, the daughter of a Portuguese doctor specializing in oncology, was born Teresa Simoes-Ferriera and was raised in Mozambique before attending schools in South Africa and Switzerland. She has served as a lead representative for the United States at numerous international conferences on human rights, the environment and related issues.
In “This Moment on Earth,” Kerry and Heinz find outstanding examples of those who are leading the way in the new environmental movement, from a Cape Cod mother to an apple grower in Washington State to leaders in Washington.
All are fighting air and water pollution, cancer-causing household chemicals and other “big picture” environmental issues that are affecting them, their families and their neighbors in highly personal ways.
In early April, N Magazine editor Bill Ferrall spoke with Heinz from her home in Sun Valley, Idaho—she and Kerry also keep homes in Washington, DC, in Boston and here on Nantucket—about how the book came about and about her unique views on today’s environmental challenges.
Part I of that interview explores what inspired the book and the big environmental issues that Heinz believes we must deal with first. Part II of our interview will be published in the Late Spring issue of N near the end of May.
Who came up with the idea for the book?
I was thinking of doing one on my work with women’s health and the environment. John thought that from everything we saw and experienced while on the (presidential) campaign, we should really do something on the environment. I didn’t think we could do something that was true to who we both are and to what we each think. Not that we have a lot of terrible differences, but a book is a personal statement. Then we figured it out: I would focus on the areas that I have more experience, and he would do his. Then we’d read each other’s work and give each other ideas and questions. That’s how we did it. By not focusing on us as much as the result of our experiences with other people, it becomes a book that honors the efforts of these people as citizens. It’s not just a dry ‘issue’ book and it’s not just a personal storytelling book. It’s a story about all of us and where we are.
I like the balance. Did either of you develop unexpected passions for some topic in the book?
some topic in the book? We were aware of and exposed to more issues than we could put in the book. There are certain things that we didn’t deal with very much—like population growth—not because we don’t think it’s a very big problem [but because] it’s a problem we’re not going to solve in ten years by ourselves. Other things are much more urgent.
What does it take to motivate someone to become an environmental activist? What is it about their character?
A lot of the people who we talk about don’t consider themselves environmental activists. Some don’t even like ‘tree huggers.’ That’s why we call them the ‘new environmentalists.’
They’re doing environmental work, they just don’t necessarily think of it that way. Just like I didn’t grow up and get stamped, or become, an environmentalist as such. I was interested in doing what I do before that word was even out.
The book is an invitation to people to be smart, be observant, ask questions and demand the right thing. In the case of Helen Reddout [a Washington State apple and cherry farmer who fought sewage pollution from nearby dairy facilities], it took twenty years—seven years just to get that court case going—and she had no help from anybody. She was a farmer, sixth generation. She just knew this [situation] was really wrong. In her case, she saw the smells and then the polluted waters in her own aquifer. She said she should have read the Clean Water Act, but she didn’t even know it existed.
Do people in this country take a lot of time to act because everyone’s so used to listening to authority?
I would say that’s actually more [true] in Europe than it is here. People in Europe are more accepting of the law and having to do without sometimes. Here, we’ve had so much bounty and wealth of mountains, water, food and big houses. People, generally speaking, have had a lot more here than anywhere else. If you show them the advantages of doing something [better] this way over that way, they’ll forge ahead and do it very fast.
So you think Americans are more questioning?
Generally I do. I think it’s just a question of our history, of the wealth of this nation as a whole.Yet, we don’t have a hybrid car for everybody. Why not?
That’s happening more and more in Europe.
And in Europe the cars are much smaller. Did John tell you about the lithium battery device being made partly in Massachusetts? He saw it on a Toyota Prius last week, and it got 150 miles to the ‘gallon.’ That’s amazing. It is a plug-in, so you plug it in to the house. The question would be what if your source of energy is a very polluting one.You have to go to the source. That’s the next ‘statement.’ That’s more of a community statement. If you make the individual commitment, then you work in the community—and the government should, too—to make sure you’re not polluting.
You’re a special person in that you have a world view of these things. What are the top issues that people should be caring about in terms of the environment?
Number one is global climate change. Because poor people—in fact, anybody who is living on coasts—will be most affected by rising waters. We’re seeing this in Florida and Louisiana, in the terrible storms that have devastated the southern part of the country and in tornadoes in the middle. Global climate change is kind of the envelope we live in and it affects everything. It affects growth. It affects rainfall and therefore creates deserts, migration and hunger.
We’re experimenting [in Idaho] with some trees that normally in the cold climate would not do well. But in forests up here, twenty-five minutes away from here, when you get into the real open wilderness, a lot of the evergreens are dying with a beetle [infestation] because they’ve had five very warm winters.
As scientists will tell you—and we’ve had cycles of three or four sequentially bad, meaning warm, winters—that bugs or gnats in there don’t die. So now you’re seeing millions of acres in Canada, all the way up north, where trees are just dying. If you lose the trees, you lose one of nature’s carbon six. It’s devastation. That’s global climate change. It causes asthma, it causes desertification, it causes flooding, it causes terrible storms. ‘Cause’ is a big word, but it’s all linked. I’m looking to plant a mixture of trees… to see if we can get some nut trees to grow up here as a source of protein.
What are the tangible ways that people can get a grasp on this?
Nantucket is a little island. I have principals about islands and about houses that are on water, [freshwater] river or marine. You should not, for those houses, put anything on the soil. No lawns that look like Kentucky bluegrass or the greens at St. Andrew’s [Golf Course]. That is not appropriate.
I can have a lawn that looks half decent. I don’t want perfection there. We have to keep our water safe. There’s a lot of toxicity in our houses from sprays and things we use. One of my interests in [breast cancer on Cape Cod] in ‘93 was ‘is this another case where the aquifers are destroyed?’
It was interesting that in Marin County [in California,] on Long Island [in New York] and on Cape Cod, they had these huge concentrations of cancer. I kept thinking, ‘Are the aquifers damaged? Are they drinking and eating vegetables that have bad water?’ They actually did a study on the carcinogenicity of that, and it turned out to be the DDT and all the sprays and all the household products. My dad was an oncologist, and it’s interesting to me. The connection between junk and cancer is more and more certain.
NEXT ISSUE Teresa Heinz on why some leaders in Washington resist embracing the notion of global warming, how each of us can contribute to solutions to environmental problems and the ramifications of the proposed wind farm in Nantucket Sound.











